There is a lot to love in South Carolina. Beautiful sandy
beaches - anywhere you are in SC you can’t bee too far from the Atlantic. The weather, although a little hot and
humid in the summer for my taste, is pretty fine. Global warming aside, in January there are many days that
you can be outside in your shirtsleeves and shorts. The mountains
in the northwest corner are another lovely attraction. Breathtaking fall foliage and cool
little lakes, great state parks and forest, forest, forest. You don’t have to go very far at all to
find a leafy green place to hang out, to get away from the city.
The people here are generally friendly too. People you don’t even know wave to you,
let you in when you are in a bind in traffic, thank you sincerely for
whatever. If you go into a post
office, the person behind the counter is likely to ask about your health, your
family, your well-being. I admit
that I am not the friendliest person, but when I am out with Heidi and we go
into a familiar place such as the bank or a restaurant, the room comes
alive. It’s like being with Norm
from Cheers… (Bar Crowd: NORM! Sam: What's new, Normie? Norm: Terrorists, Sam. They've taken over my stomach. They're demanding beer.) Only it’s, “HEIDI!”
But one thing that that I will never get used to is the zany politics
here. Or the amount of emphasis on
citizens being able to own as many of whatever kinds of guns they can get their
hands on. And when politics and
guns bridge? We may cross over from
plain-old-ordinary-garden-variety-nuttiness to downright insanity.
Well, no place is perfect I guess.
Take for example the bill that has 57 lawmakers signing on that would
make it illegal for doctors to discuss
gun safety with their patients. Don’t
believe it? Check out last Sunday's State newspaper. Front
page. Above the fold. “What?” you ask. “What about our FIRST AMMENDMENT right
to free speech? What about Big
Government intrusion?” Here are
some excerpts from that story.
The bill has stunned some
doctors, especially pediatricians, who say they do talk with patients about
safety steps to be taken when there’s a gun in the household, to make sure a
child isn’t accidentally shot. Besides, they say, they are guaranteed free
speech under the First Amendment, just as gun owners have gun rights under the
Second Amendment.
“They (gun rights supporters)
are trying to get Big Government to come in and dictate what we can and cannot
say, while at the same time, they are trying to tell Big Government to stay out
of their right to own guns,” said Dr. Deborah Greenhouse, a Columbia
pediatrician who is president of the S.C. Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics.
In the past 10 years,
Greenhouse said, two children who were patients of her pediatric group’s
practice were killed in home gun accidents that might have been prevented if
more safety procedures had been in place. Since then, she said, she has made it
a point to ask patients if guns are in the home and, if the answer is yes, to
review a safety checklist.
“No one has ever taken
offense, and numerous people have thanked me,” she said. “Many families aren’t
aware of all the safety procedures I discuss. And you wouldn’t believe how many
children know where their parents’ guns are.”
That’s exactly the kind of
doctor-patient conversation that a bill by Rep.
Joshua Putnam, R-Anderson, would outlaw in South Carolina.
“We don’t want citizens to
feel like they are going to be intruded upon whenever they go to a physician,”
Putnam said in an interview last week.
Under Putnam’s bill, except in
relevant emergency situations, doctors would not be able to ask patients if
they have guns. Since many gun safety discussions originate with that question,
the bill could stop doctors from initiating conversations about safety.
The reason for the bill,
Putnam said, is that he’s trying to protect doctors from any future federal law
that might force them to ask patients about gun ownership.
This is like a bad Twilight Zone story to me. While we are all about individual
rights and Constitutional rights; we are so uptight about the reach of
Big Government, yet we might deny the free speech of doctors initiating conversations
about gun safety with their patients and their young patients’ parents? And you know who is feeling defensive
by this idiocy? Not Joshua Putnam who sponsored the
bill, but Dr. Greenhouse who wants to protect the lives of her patients. She is quoted in the story as saying
that she knows she’ll be criticized by her stance.
One might not think there is a need for doctors to bring up gun
safety with their patients, but in the last month in South Carolina there have
been 3 children shot to death in gun accidents in their homes.
• Tmorej Smith, 3, was
shot and killed Feb. 1 in his Greenville apartment while he and his sister
played with a loaded handgun.
• Easton Brueger, 8, was
shot and killed by his father Dec. 30 in his Bennettsville home while his
father was cleaning a rifle.
• Sincere Smith, 2, was
shot and killed in his Horry County home after he grabbed a loaded handgun
sitting on a table.
Richland County Sherriff, Leon Lott, called the bill “asinine”. (The emphasis is mine.) “Instead of preventing people from
talking about gun safety, we should be encouraging more people to speak out.”
Do you think there is a need to discuss gun safety? In the United States in 2011 there were 851 accidental shooting deaths.
To Rep. Putnam I’d say, tell the parents of Tmorej Smith, Easton
Brueger and Sincere Smith that the unfettered right to own and bear arms is
more important than the right of pediatricians to have the free speech
guaranteed in our Constitution.
I wonder what the rest of the country will think of this story. I wonder how Stephen Colbert will play
it. What will the Tea Party think
of it? They are all for free
speech, right? How about Wayne LaPierre
(“Guns
don’t kill people. Video games, the media and Obama’s budget kill
people.”)? Doesn’t he agree with the first
amendment?
I ask this question in all seriousness, how does Rep. Putnam sleep
at night?
1 comment:
It angers me to see this kind of legislation....it saddens me....with legislation like this and legislators that support it it makes me feel defeated and defenseless as an advocate for children and at-risk populations. I think some of these male legislators have never brought a child of their own to a physical well-visit appointment. I am glad that my children's pediatrician cares about the overall physical, mental and spiritual health of my children. He cares. He asks how many hours of television they watch a week - HOW INTRUSIVE! He asks how much time is spent on the computer - ANTI-TECHNOLOGY! He asks where they go to school and what classes they enjoy and how their grades are - PERSONAL INFRINGEMENT ISSUES! He even goes so far as to ask what extra-curricular activities they are involved in and what their favorite books are!!!! If certain legislators found out about this - I don't want to know what they would do! Actually - probably nothing because the television, computer and book lobbyists aren't involved.
Post a Comment